Most child abusers are women: report
How The Women's Movement Taught Women to Hate Men - By Erin Pizzey
Owner of Pizzeria Refuses to Remove Deadbeat Dad Posters in Face of Fathers 4 Justice Demonstration
FRAUDSTER WOMAN LOSES İN COURT....YEAH!!!!!!!!
Information, article and discussion about a recent report about DV experienced by men
AMERİCANS AGAİNST FEMİNAZİS DO YOU WANT TO SEE A REALLY SCARRY STUFF? click the link below.....
THE WORLD ACCORDİNG TO FEMİNİSTS
For nearly three decades the world got brainwashed into thinking that only men were the perpetrators at domestic violence.
The world got told that only men were rapist, molesters, paedophiles, and the feminists used all sort of adjectives under the sun to describe men, in a derogatory terms.
Thirty years is a long time, a generation of people under the feminists dictatorial system were born, only to understand the evil that it has created, and the way it has touched their lives, by ruining it.
Countless men paid the price with their lives as a result of feminists lies and deceits.
Since the advent of feminism, the domestic violence issue has turned into a multi billion dollars business on a worldwide scale. A plethora of various professionals are making a nice and comfortable living on the back of miserable men.
The divorce rate has reached such hights that, it is now almost unfashionable to ask whether a person is married, but, rather whether one is divorced or not!
Children from broken homes are roaming the streets, pillaging every conceivable thing, to feed their drug ravaged young and tender bodies.
Parental alienation is rife and used to keep the children from their loving fathers.
False allegations are churning and spitting apprehended violence orders in an un-imaginable numbers, to keep men from getting a fair and equitable asset distribution, during the divorce proceedings.
Excessive child support orders are creating a new breed of “nouveau pauvre” or “new poor” men, not having any chance to re-marry again, they find themselves in the marginal section of society and hence unable to re-build their lives, and in a state of gross despair, they decide to terminate their lives and sometimes take their children and ex wives, with them.
İn their zeal to support this totalitarian and marxist ideology, and for fear of retribution, our politicians are bending backwards, to please the feminists.
The religious books are being re-written to show God as either genderless or as woman. The sacro-saint religious rules are constantly being defied and arbitrarly broken, as in the case of apppointing feminist indoctrinated woman priests and gay theologians.
The “New World Order” is taking shape where, the definition of a family is now including gay and lesbians couples and where single parenthood, mainly single motherhood, is now actively promoted as the “inn thing”.
Hollywood and the media is turning out male hating and violence towards men into either comedies or novels or films.
Becoming a primary school teacher for men is frustratingly a taboo profession less they are labeled as paedophiles or child molesters. Thus, children in their early years are being deprived of a male role models.
The “Lace curtain” is ever vigilant about woman and feminist criticism and in constant fear that a weekly here or a newspaper there, might slip one or more such articles. Writers and commentators who dare to criticise feminists are prone to severe retribution and stygmatisation.
The term “Politically Correct” is ever exacerbating punishment for those brave enough to utter the word “hostess” instead of saying a “flight attendant”.
The ever increasing women work force participation and encroachment into traditional male work areas, are creating resentment for the lack of similar jobs given to men in the past. The “Affirmative Action” is covertly trying to say that “it’s ok to discriminate against men” and as if this wasn’t enough the feminists are trying to push and in some countries have introduced “Positive Discrimination in favor of women”. What I fail to understand is how a discrimination of any sort can be a positive one?
The discussion topic “equal pay for equal work” seem to be gathering steam as the gap between woman and man earnings are down to a narrow 8% in Australia, according to a report “woman in Australia 2007” just out.
The law has not escaped from the feminists tentacles either.
More and more women are now becoming criminals and by reason of either “insanity” or “provocation” or surprising as it may seem, because of simply being a “woman” they escape from being punished and in more cases than I care to remember, they are being set free!
I may continue to list countless other injustices, inequalities and unjust changes. Suffice to say that, these changes are hurting men worldwide and causing untold hardship and deaths.
What started as the “Women’s rights are human rights” or “Equal rights for women” protests and marches, turned-out to be a complete and utter, farsical, sour joke and a well choreographed lie.
The irrevocable truth is – Feminism wants total control of state and subjugate and marginilise men. This was their goal, and to a great extend they had a spectacular success,because, we men, BELİEVED them.
As a result of this belief, the world has changed for the worse and we men, are and have been in a defensive position ever since.
However, having said all that, we should now ponder very seriously as to what
extend, we as men, and the world at large, are going to do, to reverse this terminally dangerous trends, and what means and ways are we going to use to create a more just world for the future?
Yours in arms.
FLASH...FLASH...YET ANOTHER DOMESTİC VİOLENCE CRAP İS DEBUNKED!
Why is there a need to create a case against feminism?
The primary reason that feminism requires debunking is that feminism is not about women. It is not for women. Feminism is about power for, and the political agenda of a small group of people, mostly women, who use women for their pawns, very much as Hitler used the German people to gain his personal goals. The mainstream media has been the willing accomplices in the feminist takeover of our society and therefore as guilty as the feminists themselves for the harm that has been done.
Feminism is based upon a lie. There is a significant difference between men and women and feminism tries to ignore or attack that difference. Books like "Men Are From Mars and Women Are From Venus" document the differences in even the method of thinking and communicating that men and women have. Other differences include the female’s natural tendency to nurture that males just do not have. Children are in essential need of this nurturing, which feminism is intent on removing. Men are inherently more aggressive than women. These differences are real but feminism, because an admission of this reality would destroy their movement, refuses to see them. Since all of their claims are based upon a rejection of fact, feminism is destined to come to false conclusions. This has been clearly demonstrated over the thirty plus years that their philosophy has held sway in this country.
Feminism is a cruel religion. It is cruel to women. It places women into positions that women are not equipped to handle, and allows them to be abused, raped or murdered because of where they have gone. For example, the military is clearly an unsafe place for a woman, even in peacetime, but feminism is pushing as hard as it can to increase the numbers of women in this dangerous, and manly world. The results have already been unacceptably cruel, but the push is still on. The huge number of law suits by women who are harassed daily in the workplace, clearly demonstrate the inability of women to work along side men without ridged controls which were never required when men worked only with other men. Even with these controls in place, a woman is forever at risk. Feminists have no concern whatsoever for these women. Their only concern is for extending their power and furthering their philosophy.
Feminism is antagonistic to children in the extreme. Children get in the way of the feminist agenda. Whenever something gets in their way, feminists use the power of government to insure that the obstruction gets run over. The feminists are happiest when they can eliminate the problem of children early on, through abortion. If a baby is killed, it won't slow down a woman at work, and cannot possibly tie her down to a homemaker role. This makes feminists happy. If they fail in killing the children, they next attempt to push children into day-care centers, where mothers can avoid the time consuming task of actually raising the little nuisances. Feminism wants to rid women of any ties to children. This is devastating to the children, if not actually fatal.
Feminism is anti-man. Their "A woman needs a man, like a fish needs a bicycle," motto is clearly a declaration of war on the institution of marriage. Men have no role in the feminist world and are merely considered an obstacle to be overcome or removed. The role of husband is now filled only as a temporary position and that is the way feminism likes it. In fact, from the feminist point of view, it is a superfluous role that should be eliminated completely.Feminism is not compatible with civilization. No civilization is possible without families. Families are where children learn civilized behavior. The weaker the families are, and the more temporary they are, the weaker and more likely to fail is the civilization. Feminism is a dagger aimed right at the heart of families. If that dagger is successfully placed, our civilization is over.
Sunday, March 18, 2007
A female middle school teacher was arrested Wednesday accused of having sex with five boys under her supervision. In a wide range of locations outside & inside the school a Allenna Williams is said to have had sex with boys varying in ages up to 15. Investigators say there could be more cases coming to light. She is charged with five counts of second-degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor and six counts of lewd acts on a minor.
The question remains will she receive the same time as a man who is convicted of such acts as raping 5 girls under his care in a school setting. I’m not holding my breath.
First will come the mentally unstable news stories, second will be the shrinks coming to her defense, followed by all the other steps we have come to be all so familiar with pointing to some man who did something to her to cause this evil. She is bound to be out in under 10 years by my reckoning of the weggy board of feminist law. She should get equal time (no more, no less), and any woman who doesn’t agree loses any integrity of her equality. If this world is to be equal then the sentencing average time for both sexes should be about the same. Unfortunately it is now distorted by chivalrous men and feminists both who agree on hard time for men and easy time for women.
Even more important is how well this story gets ignored, skipped over or back-paged by the MSM, who just can’t seem to get enough of the Libby story, when they have another Medusa story with all the hallmarks of what they calm they have to cove, due to the public interest in such things. That being sex, sex and more sex. Let’s watch and see how much coverage this gets!
Priority News Exchange Program News Item (PNEP)
Friday, March 9, 2007
with designer accessories and within minutes of meeting a man want to know
his bank balance.
Watch out! Toxic Wife Syndrome is rampant and droves of gold diggers are
prowling in search of rich prey to join the tribe.
So says British journalist Tara Winter Wilson whose guide to spotting a
potential toxic wife touched a raw nerve with hordes of victims contacting
her about the so-called syndrome.
Her warning is stark: "Unless you marry an equal who is going to pay her
own way, you will end up with a lazy, indulgent, over-pampered slug."
"Marriage is being clouded by Toxic Wife Syndrome. Ridiculous amounts of
money keep being awarded to these women in divorce settlements. "
Winter Wilson, staggered by the flood of heartfelt feedback she got after
first naming the syndrome in a lifestyle article for the Daily Telegraph
newspaper, said: "Many women see it as a career choice."
"After leaving university, they stay on the party circuit until they trap
someone. They try to get the most by doing the least. They develop an
extraordinary sense of entitlement, becoming very judgmental and shrewish,"
she told Reuters. She said she had hate mail from women who accused her of
being a misogynist who also betrayed feminism.
Stoutly defending her stand, Winter Wilson argued: "The toxic wife is a
complete disservice to women. It does us no favours. Stay-at-home mothers
should be applauded, not reviled."
"I think the stigma of being at home and looking after children should be
taken away. The toxic wife thinks she is above it all. It makes me burn
She was prompted into print after a young male banker approached her at a
party and "whispered that I would be doing a good service if I could write
about the high maintenance wife scenario."
The danger signals of a wife going toxic are all too plain:
- She gives up work to care for the children and then sends them to
boarding schools as soon as they outgrow their nannies.
- She demands wall-to-wall help with a maid hired to work up to 14 hours a
day six days a week.
- Cooking and housework are strictly out of bounds
- They have to live in a country mansion, forcing the husband to commute
daily to London.
"I have had feedback from readers around the world recognising the
syndrome. In America, many people wrote in about their toxic wives," she said.
So, does she practice what she preaches?
"I married for love but sadly am divorced. I pay my ex-husband one pound a
year in alimony and he pays me one pound. We have two children. I have them
one week and he then has them one week. They are unbelievably sane, happy
Sunday, March 4, 2007
A judge Friday threw out a murder charge against a USC
student accused of leaving her newborn son's body in a
trash bin outside her apartment...
Ashcraft, 22, was charged with murder and child abuse
after a homeless man found the body outside her
residence near the USC campus in 2005.
Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge David Wesley
said he wasn't convinced that prosecutors could prove the
architecture student had the necessary criminal intent to
sustain a murder charge....
Instead, Wesley said, prosecutors could bring lesser
charges of involuntary manslaughter and child
In a February 2006 autopsy report, Deputy Medical
Examiner David B.Whiteman concluded that the baby had
been born alive, because there was air in the lungs. The
cause of death was listed as homicide, and Whiteman said
it stemmed from "caretaker neglect."...
Geragos called the refiling a "last-ditch effort" and
"gamesmanship" by prosecutors...
The lawyer added that Ashcraft had been "within striking
distance of putting this nightmare behind her."
Ashcraft attended the hearings with her mother and sister.
The three appeared happy, often smiling during the
By Peter Y. Hong, Times Staff Writer
Friday, March 2, 2007
Man cannot make sacrifice only his duty, but, everything that a woman makes is a sacrifice......Bullocks!!!
This from a young American guy who’s giving lots of food for thought.
Divorce and “sacrifices”
If you go through a modern divorce in the West, the sacrifices your wife made during the marriage is key to how much she’ll be given of your wealth, and with some blubbing, some twisting of facts, some feminist double-think and plenty of lies, the sacrifices she made will be blown out of all proportion.
Naturally, any sacrifices you make will be regarded as irrelevent. In fact they’ll be twisted round to be seen as benefits you obtained on the back of your wife. Earning £100,000 a year at the end of your marriage? That’s half thanks to your wife and she’s entitled to half of that from now on. Nevermind if you only earned that amount through slogging your guts out and half-dying of stress, or if you barely got to spend any of that without asking your wife’s permission, or if you only crawled your way up the career ladder to keep up with her ever inflating material demands. Doesn’t matter. Pay her £50,000 a year after the divorce until she marries some other sucker. Get a pay-raise? So does she. Pay up. Or else, motherfucker.
Take careers. Now a woman will talk about “sacrificing - sob - my career”, which is clearly bollocks, given that they marry to quit their hated jobs (why else do they never marry guys beneath them status-wise, and thus unable to support them?) Claiming they sacrifice their careers is just a way of establishing victim-status before the divorce courts.
However, even if we accept the laughable notion that a woman quitting working 40-hours a week in a dreary office to stay at home and be provided for by a man counts as a sacrifice, so what? Why should she be compensated in any way? The man has made a sacrifice by providing for both himself and her, and possibly kids too, in that he has given up the choice of working the minimum necessary to support only himself. He’s sacrificed a stress-free life of responsible for no-one but himself, and possibly plenty of weekends out with the lads that he now spends them doing overtime.
Yet this is irrelevant to many women and certainly to the divorce courts. A man doesn’t make “sacrifices”, he merely does his duty, and damn him if he doesn’t. No matter that a man has sacrificed anything, all that they take into account is what the woman has given up, and thus she ought to be compensated. Most ludicrious of all is the insane belief that working is actually fun, when in fact it’s rubbish and, for most men, a means to an end. The opposite notion is put forth in divorce courts. A wife who gave up her job has made a tremendous sacrifice and requires compensation. The husband who, after marriage and after his wife quit her job, had to go from working 35-hours a week to working twice that has somehow benefited! Having all that fun virtually living at the office whilst his poor wikkle wife drags herself to lunch at Starbucks with her fellow ladies of leisure. Therefore she should be compensated by being allowed to keep their her hom e and half of her husband’s future income to compensate her. What bollocks.
This is reversed when the genders are switched, naturally. In the rare instances that a man quits his job after marriage whilst his wife works harder to support them both and their kids, then he’s a lazy slacker who, should it come to divorce, will be tossed out of their her home and told to be grateful his wife supported him by slaving away at work all those years.
This is why you are badly fucked if you are dumb enough to get married in the Matriarchy. Everything your new wife gives up that she liked (and the stuff she disliked, but later claims to have liked) and everything she has to do that she disliked (and the stuff she liked, but later claims to have disliked) during the marriage is your fault and she will get compensation if/when the divorce comes.
It doesn’t matter if she nagged and manipulated you into marriage. All she has to do in make out how much she had to give up - her job, her freedom, her youth, fucking whatever - after “he pressed me into marriage” and the judge in the divorce court will almost be wiping a tear from his - or, God forbid, her - eye before seeing to it that she receives just compensation for all this “hardship and sacrifice” in the form of lots of assets and cash from you.
Don’t even bother pointing out any sacrifices you made, or that you didn’t actually like - nor benefited from - working extra hard after your wife quit her job. That doesn’t matter. You’re a man, and in the eyes of divorce courts, that means you don’t matter.
Women are virtually immune from accountability and responsibility in the Matriarchal divorce process. It doesn’t matter if she filed for divorce (60% to 90% of divorces are filed by women in the West) for little or no reason. It doesn’t matter if she fought tooth and nail to get custody of the kids, even making up false allegations of abuse to ensure she takes them away from you. The fact is that she’s now a divorcee and single mother, and the judge will declare it was obviously your fault for being a bad husband and making her leave you and lumbering her with raising two children on her own, and the full force of law will be bought home to ensure you don’t shirk your duty and responsibilities to support your (voluntarily ex-)wife and your children (who you have little or no right to see again.)
Marriage is slavery for women, remember? That’s the feminist line, and the feminist line rules in family courts these days. Nothing else. Justice? That went out with the Patriarchy.
In the view of the feminist nazis of divorce courts in the West, by marrying your wife you will have enslaved her and made her give up her precious freedom and career, and you will pay for all of this. You will pay, for a long time.
Stay single. Obviously.from:http://www.menz.org.nz/
Thursday, March 1, 2007
WASHINGTON, Jan. 29 / U.S. Newswire / – Over one million false allegations of domestic violence are filed each year. These allegations often result in family break-up and the removal of children from their parents, according to a report released today.
"A Culture of False Allegations: How VAWA Harms Families and Children" documents how the Violence Against Women Act defines "domestic violence" in broad terms. That has given rise to one million claims of domestic "violence" each year in which physical violence is not even alleged.
Elaine Epstein, former president of the Massachusetts Bar Association, is on the record as saying, "Everyone knows that restraining orders and orders to vacate are granted to virtually all who apply ... In many cases, allegations of abuse are now used for tactical advantage."
An example of the problem is Dan Iagatta of Foxboro, Mass. A quadriplegic dad who is confined to a wheelchair, he was accused of domestic abuse by his wife and recently ordered to vacate his home.
"False allegations of domestic violence have become so widespread that lawyers now call them a legal 'slam-dunk,'" notes RADAR spokesman Ron Grignol. "Some are saying we should pass a David Letterman Protection Act to curb the problem."
TV talk-show host Letterman was formally charged with domestic violence after a New Mexico woman accused him of harassing her with mental telepathic messages.
Restraining orders are now seen as part of the "gamesmanship of divorce," according to a 2005 article in the Illinois Bar Journal. The RADAR report documents how these false allegations violate civil rights and harm families. As a result, children often lose daily contact with one of their parents.
The report was issued by RADAR (Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting), a research and education organization. The report can be viewed at http://www.mediaradar.org/docs/VAWA-A-Culture-of-False-Allegations.pdf.
The document reveals that children who grow up in a single-parent home are greater risk of child abuse, academic failure, and a broad range of social pathologies. The report concludes that VAWA needs to be reformed to become family-friendly.
R.A.D.A.R. – Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting – is a non-profit, non-partisan organization of men and women working to improve the effectiveness of our nation's approach to solving domestic violence. http://www.mediaradar.org.
Tuesday, February 27, 2007
February 22, 2007
A DOTING dad told yesterday how he brought up four kids as his own — only to find they were all fathered by his wife’s secret LOVER.
Cheated Charles Bostock, 69, spent years thinking the three cherished girls and a boy were his children.
He only discovered the shock news when his 49-year-old wife Sarah fell pregnant with a FIFTH child by married love rival Richard Mills.
Retired policeman Charles knew he could not be the dad because he had not bedded Sarah for many months.
Pals finally told him who the baby’s dad was. But he did not learn the truth about the other four children — aged 12, ten, nine and six — until DNA tests proved they were Mills’.
Heartbroken Charles said yesterday: “I feel like the life has been ripped out of me.
“I brought those kids up for 12 years like any normal dad. I changed their nappies, dried their tears, took them to school — and now I’ve lost everything. I still love them and they love me, but what sort of life will they have now?
Click here to find out more!
“And how can someone be married to somebody all those years and just stick two fingers up to them? She’s nothing but a whore, a tramp and an adulteress. What those two have done to me is evil.”
Charles added: “Sarah must have known all along the kids were his — why didn’t she say?
“She kept up the lie all those years. She kept me going, using me like some sugar daddy to pay for Mills’ kids.
“If she’d had the courage to tell me the truth at the start I could have had a chance of rebuilding my life. But not any more. It’s too late for me.”
Mills, 48, who has a grown-up son and daughter by wife Carol, recently fathered a SIXTH child with Sarah.
But he is refusing to live with her and his lovechildren, and Sarah suspects he is cheating on her too. Plant hire boss Mills has now been divorced, while Charles’ 28-year marriage ended the same way. The shell-shocked ex-cop — who left his £400,000 marital home near Bodmin, Cornwall, about 18 months ago — has even contemplated SUICIDE.
He said: “Mills has wrecked two marriages and so many lives. I’ve lost everything — my home, my wife, my kids, all the things I worked hard for.
“I was going to end it all and I’ve even thought how to. The kids want me to come back home and still be their dad. But I’m just in limbo.”
Charles wed second wife Sarah in 1979. Within six months she fell pregnant with daughter Alison, now 26. Two years later she bore Charles a son — also named Charles.
In 1986 Charles Snr was pensioned off from the police after a motorbike accident and left Staines, Surrey, for a new life in Cornwall.
He got a job as a council waste regulation officer and Sarah looked after their two children at home. But 12 years ago she became pregnant again — with what turned out to be the first of Mills’ kids.
As another three siblings followed in the next six years, Charles thought his family and life were complete. Sarah even put his name on their birth certificates, although she’s now planning to call them Mills.
In 2001 Sarah told her hubby she wanted more kids. When he refused on cost grounds, she angrily declared she wouldn’t have sex with him any more.
But months later she announced she was pregnant.
Charles said: “I told her, ‘That’s impossible — I haven’t touched you for at least nine months’. I asked who the dad was but she wouldn’t say. She even claimed she’d had sex with me while I was asleep.”
Sarah insisted on having the child — a girl now nearly five — and Charles demanded a separation. Just before the birth, he learned Mills’ identity when pals tipped him off.
He said: “I could have killed him — I could have murdered them both. But Mills said he didn’t want anything to do with the child and after a while I said I’d take her on and look after her as my own.
“I thought it was a one-off and I was prepared to live with that for my kids’ sake.”
Charles remained in the house to be with “his” children, but quit the marital bed.
He said: “She then started seeing Mills again. She taunted me saying, ‘You’re ugly and old — he’s virile and rich and he’s got a Mercedes’.
“That’s when I moved out and started on the divorce.”
A few months later, the children visited Charles and broke the bombshell news that Mills was their real father.
He said: “They said, ‘Richard took swabs from our mouths’.
“My wife refused to say why but a few weeks later they came again and the 12-year-old said, ‘You aren’t our dad’.
“I said, ‘Of course I am’. And she said, ‘No Richard Mills has told us that he is’.”
Charles got his solicitor to order DNA tests — and they confirmed the terrible truth.
The ex-cop said he has only met Mills once and also seen him briefly at a court hearing.
He added: “You couldn’t print what I really think of him, although I told him over the phone. He’s a total liar. His whole life’s been a lie and hers too. And I’ve been their victim.
“Thanks to them I’ve lost everything — now I’m nothing but a lonely old man. I keep thinking what an idiot I was.”
Mills last night did not deny our story. He asked: “Why’s that such big news?” Sarah confirmed she had had six of his children.
Thursday, February 15, 2007
NINETEEN out of 20 women admit lying to their
partners or husbands, a survey on attitudes to truth
and relationships has found.
Eighty-three per cent owned up to telling "big,
life-changing lies", with 13 per cent saying they
did so frequently.
Half said that if they became pregnant by another
man but wanted to stay with their partner, they
would lie about the baby’s real father.
Forty-two per cent would lie about contraception
in order to get pregnant, no matter the wishes of
And an alarming 31 per cent said they would not
tell a future partner if they had a sexual disease:
this rises to 65 per cent among single women.
In the poll of 5,000 women for That’s Life!
magazine, 45 per cent said they told "little white
lies" most days. The favourite untruth was "of
course you don’t look fat", with "these shoes were
only £10" in second place.
Jo Checkley, the editor of That’s Life! , said that
while many women now lied to avoid hurting their
partner’s feelings, covering up the truth about a
baby could have far more damaging
She said: "Modern women just can’t stop lying, but
they do it to stop hurting other people’s feelings. It
could be argued that these little white lies simply
make the world go round a little more smoothly.
But to tell a man a baby is his when it’s not, or to
deliberately get pregnant when your partner
doesn’t want a baby, is playing Russian roulette
with other people’s lives."
The National Scruples and Lies Survey 2004 found
plenty of untruths were told over the Christmas
period. A total of 78 per cent said they would pass
off a second-hand gift as a brand new present,
while half have lied about a Christmas card being
"lost in the post".
Women will also lie to save people’s feelings, with
only 27 per cent saying they would tell a man if he
was hopeless in bed (although a third would tell
their friends all about it).
Just over half would flatter a man if he asked them
about his looks and only 46 per cent would give
the "brutal truth". However, 61 per cent of women
would want their partners to be "brutally honest" if
they asked them "do I look fat?" or "do you think
my best friend’s attractive?"
Elsewhere, 54 per cent admitted stealing sweets
or chocolates; 23 per cent would "sneak a bottle
or two" home if they were invited to a party by a
well-off friend; 49 per cent would "kiss and tell" to
the media for £25,000 if they had a one-night stand
with a celebrity; and 38 per cent say they would
marry purely for money.
Nearly half said they had faked orgasms and 55
per cent admitted claiming they were tired, had a
headache, or felt ill to "get out of lovemaking".
Nineteen per cent of women with a long-term
partner said they had cheated on him, while 30
per cent of all women have had an affair with a
married man. Sixty-eight per cent said they did not
trust their partner.
As far as trustworthy personalities are concerned,
the woman with "the most honest face" was Fern
Britton, the This Morning host. She was followed
by the singer Kerry Katona (formerly McFadden),
Sharon Osbourne of The X Factor and the Queen.
The "most honest male face" jointly went to Ant
and Dec, the presenters of I’m A Celebrity ... Get
Me Out Of Here!, with Prince William second.
The results come in the wake of the controversy
surrounding David Blunkett, the Home Secretary,
and his former lover, the publisher Kimberly
Quinn. They had a child, but she kept details of
the affair secret from her husband Stephen, even
taking her son to Corfu for a week’s holiday to
bond with him this year.
Mr Quinn accepted his wife’s story, but she had
covered up the fact she was accompanied by Mr
• The survey questioned 5,000 women, average
age 38, across Scotland, England, Wales and
Top ten porkies
That’s Life! magazine has carried out its National
Scruples and Lies Survey 2004 to find out the top
ten lies told by women. They are:
1. "Of course you don’t look fat!"
2. "These shoes were only £10."
3. "The bus/train was late."
4. "I’ve got a headache."
5. "I’ve only had one drink."
6. "That dress looks good on you."
7. "The cheque’s in the post."
8. "You look ten years younger."
9. "You’re wonderful in bed."
10. "I love you."