tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-76849843655291447842024-02-08T20:01:37.672+02:00THE REAL TERRORİSTS ARE THE FEMİNİSTS"Feminism, Socialism, and Communism are one in the same, and
Socialist/Communist government is the goal of feminism." -
Catharine A. MacKinnon, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State
(First Harvard University Press, 1989), p.10
"I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them."
Robin Morgan - former president of the National Ourganization for Women (NOW) and editor of MS magazineHarry Stantonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17389493043400033039noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7684984365529144784.post-46580184532305450032007-03-18T18:33:00.000+02:002007-03-18T18:37:12.712+02:00Female Teacher Rapes 5 Boys<span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />A female middle school teacher was arrested Wednesday accused of having sex with five boys under her supervision. In a wide range of locations outside & inside the school a Allenna Williams is said to have had sex with boys varying in ages up to 15. Investigators say there could be more cases coming to light. She is charged with five counts of second-degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor and six counts of lewd acts on a minor.<br /><br />The question remains will she receive the same time as a man who is convicted of such acts as raping 5 girls under his care in a school setting. I’m not holding my breath.<br /><br />First will come the mentally unstable news stories, second will be the shrinks coming to her defense, followed by all the other steps we have come to be all so familiar with pointing to some man who did something to her to cause this evil. She is bound to be out in under 10 years by my reckoning of the weggy board of feminist law. She should get equal time (no more, no less), and any woman who doesn’t agree loses any integrity of her equality. If this world is to be equal then the sentencing average time for both sexes should be about the same. Unfortunately it is now distorted by chivalrous men and feminists both who agree on hard time for men and easy time for women.<br /><br />Even more important is how well this story gets ignored, skipped over or back-paged by the MSM, who just can’t seem to get enough of the Libby story, when they have another Medusa story with all the hallmarks of what they calm they have to cove, due to the public interest in such things. That being sex, sex and more sex. Let’s watch and see how much coverage this gets!<br /></span>Priority News Exchange Program News Item (PNEP)<span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /></span><div class="blogger-post-footer">RSS feed</div>Harry Stantonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17389493043400033039noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7684984365529144784.post-23006566724930667072007-03-09T16:56:00.000+02:002007-03-09T16:59:13.951+02:00These wives aren't desperate, they're toxic<span style="font-weight: bold;">London: They are flirtatious, love to target older men, are weighed down<br />with designer accessories and within minutes of meeting a man want to know<br />his bank balance.<br /><br />Watch out! Toxic Wife Syndrome is rampant and droves of gold diggers are<br />prowling in search of rich prey to join the tribe.<br /><br />So says British journalist Tara Winter Wilson whose guide to spotting a<br />potential toxic wife touched a raw nerve with hordes of victims contacting<br />her about the so-called syndrome.<br /><br />Her warning is stark: "Unless you marry an equal who is going to pay her<br />own way, you will end up with a lazy, indulgent, over-pampered slug."<br /><br />"Marriage is being clouded by Toxic Wife Syndrome. Ridiculous amounts of<br />money keep being awarded to these women in divorce settlements. "<br /><br />Winter Wilson, staggered by the flood of heartfelt feedback she got after<br />first naming the syndrome in a lifestyle article for the Daily Telegraph<br />newspaper, said: "Many women see it as a career choice."<br /><br />"After leaving university, they stay on the party circuit until they trap<br />someone. They try to get the most by doing the least. They develop an<br />extraordinary sense of entitlement, becoming very judgmental and shrewish,"<br />she told Reuters. She said she had hate mail from women who accused her of<br />being a misogynist who also betrayed feminism.<br /><br />Stoutly defending her stand, Winter Wilson argued: "The toxic wife is a<br />complete disservice to women. It does us no favours. Stay-at-home mothers<br />should be applauded, not reviled."<br /><br />"I think the stigma of being at home and looking after children should be<br />taken away. The toxic wife thinks she is above it all. It makes me burn<br />with anger."<br /><br />She was prompted into print after a young male banker approached her at a<br />party and "whispered that I would be doing a good service if I could write<br />about the high maintenance wife scenario."<br /><br />The danger signals of a wife going toxic are all too plain:<br /><br />- She gives up work to care for the children and then sends them to<br />boarding schools as soon as they outgrow their nannies.<br /><br />- She demands wall-to-wall help with a maid hired to work up to 14 hours a<br />day six days a week.<br /><br />- Cooking and housework are strictly out of bounds<br /><br />- They have to live in a country mansion, forcing the husband to commute<br />daily to London.<br /><br />"I have had feedback from readers around the world recognising the<br />syndrome. In America, many people wrote in about their toxic wives," she said.<br /><br />So, does she practice what she preaches?<br /><br />"I married for love but sadly am divorced. I pay my ex-husband one pound a<br />year in alimony and he pays me one pound. We have two children. I have them<br />one week and he then has them one week. They are unbelievably sane, happy<br />and confident."<br /></span><span style="font-size:85%;">Reuters</span><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br /></span><div class="blogger-post-footer">RSS feed</div>Harry Stantonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17389493043400033039noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7684984365529144784.post-10548799729874494312007-03-04T14:15:00.000+02:002007-03-04T14:17:21.805+02:00MURDER AN İNNOCENT BABY AND WALK FREE!!!!!!<span style="font-size:85%;">March 3, 2007<br /><br />A judge Friday threw out a murder charge against a USC<br /><br />student accused of leaving her newborn son's body in a<br /><br />trash bin outside her apartment...<br /><br />Ashcraft, 22, was charged with murder and child abuse<br /><br />after a homeless man found the body outside her<br /><br />residence near the USC campus in 2005.<br /><br />Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge David Wesley<br /><br />said he wasn't convinced that prosecutors could prove the<br /><br />architecture student had the necessary criminal intent to<br /><br />sustain a murder charge....<br /><br />Instead, Wesley said, prosecutors could bring lesser<br /><br />charges of involuntary manslaughter and child<br /><br />endangerment.<br /><br />In a February 2006 autopsy report, Deputy Medical<br /><br />Examiner David B.Whiteman concluded that the baby had<br /><br />been born alive, because there was air in the lungs. The<br /><br />cause of death was listed as homicide, and Whiteman said<br /><br />it stemmed from "caretaker neglect."...<br /><br />Geragos called the refiling a "last-ditch effort" and<br /><br />"gamesmanship" by prosecutors...<br /><br />The lawyer added that Ashcraft had been "within striking<br /><br />distance of putting this nightmare behind her."<br /><br />Ashcraft attended the hearings with her mother and sister.<br /><br />The three appeared happy, often smiling during the<br /><br />afternoon proceedings...<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />By Peter Y. Hong, Times Staff Writer</span><div class="blogger-post-footer">RSS feed</div>Harry Stantonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17389493043400033039noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7684984365529144784.post-19464200123226611562007-03-02T15:19:00.000+02:002007-03-02T15:25:31.897+02:00Man cannot make sacrifice only his duty, but, everything that a woman makes is a sacrifice......Bullocks!!!<h1 style="font-weight: normal; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://menz.org.nz/2007/i-now-pronounce-you/"><br /></a></h1><span style="font-weight: bold;font-size:130%;" >I NOW PRONOUNCE YOU............................</span><br /><br />This from a young American guy who’s giving lots of food for thought. <p>Divorce and “sacrifices”<br />If you go through a modern divorce in the West, the sacrifices your wife made during the marriage is key to how much she’ll be given of your wealth, and with some blubbing, some twisting of facts, some feminist double-think and plenty of lies, the sacrifices she made will be blown out of all proportion.</p> <p>Naturally, any sacrifices you make will be regarded as irrelevent. In fact they’ll be twisted round to be seen as benefits you obtained on the back of your wife. Earning £100,000 a year at the end of your marriage? That’s half thanks to your wife and she’s entitled to half of that from now on. Nevermind if you only earned that amount through slogging your guts out and half-dying of stress, or if you barely got to spend any of that without asking your wife’s permission, or if you only crawled your way up the career ladder to keep up with her ever inflating material demands. Doesn’t matter. Pay her £50,000 a year after the divorce until she marries some other sucker. Get a pay-raise? So does she. Pay up. Or else, motherfucker.</p> <p>Take careers. Now a woman will talk about “sacrificing - sob - my career”, which is clearly bollocks, given that they marry to quit their hated jobs (why else do they never marry guys beneath them status-wise, and thus unable to support them?) Claiming they sacrifice their careers is just a way of establishing victim-status before the divorce courts. </p> <p>However, even if we accept the laughable notion that a woman quitting working 40-hours a week in a dreary office to stay at home and be provided for by a man counts as a sacrifice, so what? Why should she be compensated in any way? The man has made a sacrifice by providing for both himself and her, and possibly kids too, in that he has given up the choice of working the minimum necessary to support only himself. He’s sacrificed a stress-free life of responsible for no-one but himself, and possibly plenty of weekends out with the lads that he now spends them doing overtime.</p> <p>Yet this is irrelevant to many women and certainly to the divorce courts. A man doesn’t make “sacrifices”, he merely does his duty, and damn him if he doesn’t. No matter that a man has sacrificed anything, all that they take into account is what the woman has given up, and thus she ought to be compensated. Most ludicrious of all is the insane belief that working is actually fun, when in fact it’s rubbish and, for most men, a means to an end. The opposite notion is put forth in divorce courts. A wife who gave up her job has made a tremendous sacrifice and requires compensation. The husband who, after marriage and after his wife quit her job, had to go from working 35-hours a week to working twice that has somehow benefited! Having all that fun virtually living at the office whilst his poor wikkle wife drags herself to lunch at Starbucks with her fellow ladies of leisure. Therefore she should be compensated by being allowed to keep their her hom e and half of her husband’s future income to compensate her. What bollocks.</p> <p>This is reversed when the genders are switched, naturally. In the rare instances that a man quits his job after marriage whilst his wife works harder to support them both and their kids, then he’s a lazy slacker who, should it come to divorce, will be tossed out of their her home and told to be grateful his wife supported him by slaving away at work all those years.</p> <p>This is why you are badly fucked if you are dumb enough to get married in the Matriarchy. Everything your new wife gives up that she liked (and the stuff she disliked, but later claims to have liked) and everything she has to do that she disliked (and the stuff she liked, but later claims to have disliked) during the marriage is your fault and she will get compensation if/when the divorce comes.</p> <p>It doesn’t matter if she nagged and manipulated you into marriage. All she has to do in make out how much she had to give up - her job, her freedom, her youth, fucking whatever - after “he pressed me into marriage” and the judge in the divorce court will almost be wiping a tear from his - or, God forbid, her - eye before seeing to it that she receives just compensation for all this “hardship and sacrifice” in the form of lots of assets and cash from you. </p> <p>Don’t even bother pointing out any sacrifices you made, or that you didn’t actually like - nor benefited from - working extra hard after your wife quit her job. That doesn’t matter. You’re a man, and in the eyes of divorce courts, that means you don’t matter.</p> <p>Women are virtually immune from accountability and responsibility in the Matriarchal divorce process. It doesn’t matter if she filed for divorce (60% to 90% of divorces are filed by women in the West) for little or no reason. It doesn’t matter if she fought tooth and nail to get custody of the kids, even making up false allegations of abuse to ensure she takes them away from you. The fact is that she’s now a divorcee and single mother, and the judge will declare it was obviously your fault for being a bad husband and making her leave you and lumbering her with raising two children on her own, and the full force of law will be bought home to ensure you don’t shirk your duty and responsibilities to support your (voluntarily ex-)wife and your children (who you have little or no right to see again.)</p> <p>Marriage is slavery for women, remember? That’s the feminist line, and the feminist line rules in family courts these days. Nothing else. Justice? That went out with the Patriarchy. </p> <p>In the view of the feminist nazis of divorce courts in the West, by marrying your wife you will have enslaved her and made her give up her precious freedom and career, and you will pay for all of this. You will pay, for a long time.</p> <p>Stay single. Obviously. </p> from:<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.menz.org.nz//maillist/index.php?action=unsub&addr=thepatriarch@yahoo.com">http://www.menz.org.nz/</a><div class="blogger-post-footer">RSS feed</div>Harry Stantonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17389493043400033039noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7684984365529144784.post-77997628478391939142007-03-01T19:37:00.000+02:002007-03-01T19:38:58.619+02:00Lies,lies and more lies, in fact 1 million lies a year..One Million False Allegations of Domestic Violence Each Year, Report Finds<br /><br />WASHINGTON, Jan. 29 / U.S. Newswire / – Over one million false allegations of domestic violence are filed each year. These allegations often result in family break-up and the removal of children from their parents, according to a report released today.<br /><br />"A Culture of False Allegations: How VAWA Harms Families and Children" documents how the Violence Against Women Act defines "domestic violence" in broad terms. That has given rise to one million claims of domestic "violence" each year in which physical violence is not even alleged.<br /><br />Elaine Epstein, former president of the Massachusetts Bar Association, is on the record as saying, "Everyone knows that restraining orders and orders to vacate are granted to virtually all who apply ... In many cases, allegations of abuse are now used for tactical advantage."<br /><br />An example of the problem is Dan Iagatta of Foxboro, Mass. A quadriplegic dad who is confined to a wheelchair, he was accused of domestic abuse by his wife and recently ordered to vacate his home.<br /><br />"False allegations of domestic violence have become so widespread that lawyers now call them a legal 'slam-dunk,'" notes RADAR spokesman Ron Grignol. "Some are saying we should pass a David Letterman Protection Act to curb the problem."<br /><br />TV talk-show host Letterman was formally charged with domestic violence after a New Mexico woman accused him of harassing her with mental telepathic messages.<br /><br />Restraining orders are now seen as part of the "gamesmanship of divorce," according to a 2005 article in the Illinois Bar Journal. The RADAR report documents how these false allegations violate civil rights and harm families. As a result, children often lose daily contact with one of their parents.<br /><br />The report was issued by RADAR (Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting), a research and education organization. The report can be viewed at http://www.mediaradar.org/docs/VAWA-A-Culture-of-False-Allegations.pdf.<br /><br />The document reveals that children who grow up in a single-parent home are greater risk of child abuse, academic failure, and a broad range of social pathologies. The report concludes that VAWA needs to be reformed to become family-friendly.<br /><br />R.A.D.A.R. – Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting – is a non-profit, non-partisan organization of men and women working to improve the effectiveness of our nation's approach to solving domestic violence. http://www.mediaradar.org.<div class="blogger-post-footer">RSS feed</div>Harry Stantonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17389493043400033039noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7684984365529144784.post-14602888558387400972007-02-27T18:27:00.000+02:002007-02-27T18:29:28.360+02:00The mother of all betrayal<span style="font-weight: bold;">The mother of all betrayal</span><br /><br /> <br />February 22, 2007<br /><br /><br />A DOTING dad told yesterday how he brought up four kids as his own — only to find they were all fathered by his wife’s secret LOVER.<br /><br />Cheated Charles Bostock, 69, spent years thinking the three cherished girls and a boy were his children.<br /><br />He only discovered the shock news when his 49-year-old wife Sarah fell pregnant with a FIFTH child by married love rival Richard Mills.<br /><br />Retired policeman Charles knew he could not be the dad because he had not bedded Sarah for many months.<br /><br />Pals finally told him who the baby’s dad was. But he did not learn the truth about the other four children — aged 12, ten, nine and six — until DNA tests proved they were Mills’.<br /><br />Heartbroken Charles said yesterday: “I feel like the life has been ripped out of me.<br /><br />“I brought those kids up for 12 years like any normal dad. I changed their nappies, dried their tears, took them to school — and now I’ve lost everything. I still love them and they love me, but what sort of life will they have now?<br />*<br />Click here to find out more!<br /><br />“And how can someone be married to somebody all those years and just stick two fingers up to them? She’s nothing but a whore, a tramp and an adulteress. What those two have done to me is evil.”<br /><br />Charles added: “Sarah must have known all along the kids were his — why didn’t she say?<br /><br />“She kept up the lie all those years. She kept me going, using me like some sugar daddy to pay for Mills’ kids.<br /><br />“If she’d had the courage to tell me the truth at the start I could have had a chance of rebuilding my life. But not any more. It’s too late for me.”<br /><br />Mills, 48, who has a grown-up son and daughter by wife Carol, recently fathered a SIXTH child with Sarah.<br /><br />But he is refusing to live with her and his lovechildren, and Sarah suspects he is cheating on her too. Plant hire boss Mills has now been divorced, while Charles’ 28-year marriage ended the same way. The shell-shocked ex-cop — who left his £400,000 marital home near Bodmin, Cornwall, about 18 months ago — has even contemplated SUICIDE.<br /><br />He said: “Mills has wrecked two marriages and so many lives. I’ve lost everything — my home, my wife, my kids, all the things I worked hard for.<br /><br />“I was going to end it all and I’ve even thought how to. The kids want me to come back home and still be their dad. But I’m just in limbo.”<br /><br />Charles wed second wife Sarah in 1979. Within six months she fell pregnant with daughter Alison, now 26. Two years later she bore Charles a son — also named Charles.<br /><br />In 1986 Charles Snr was pensioned off from the police after a motorbike accident and left Staines, Surrey, for a new life in Cornwall.<br /><br />He got a job as a council waste regulation officer and Sarah looked after their two children at home. But 12 years ago she became pregnant again — with what turned out to be the first of Mills’ kids.<br /><br />As another three siblings followed in the next six years, Charles thought his family and life were complete. Sarah even put his name on their birth certificates, although she’s now planning to call them Mills.<br /><br />In 2001 Sarah told her hubby she wanted more kids. When he refused on cost grounds, she angrily declared she wouldn’t have sex with him any more.<br /><br />But months later she announced she was pregnant.<br /><br />Charles said: “I told her, ‘That’s impossible — I haven’t touched you for at least nine months’. I asked who the dad was but she wouldn’t say. She even claimed she’d had sex with me while I was asleep.”<br /><br />Sarah insisted on having the child — a girl now nearly five — and Charles demanded a separation. Just before the birth, he learned Mills’ identity when pals tipped him off.<br /><br />He said: “I could have killed him — I could have murdered them both. But Mills said he didn’t want anything to do with the child and after a while I said I’d take her on and look after her as my own.<br /><br />“I thought it was a one-off and I was prepared to live with that for my kids’ sake.”<br /><br />Charles remained in the house to be with “his” children, but quit the marital bed.<br /><br />He said: “She then started seeing Mills again. She taunted me saying, ‘You’re ugly and old — he’s virile and rich and he’s got a Mercedes’.<br /><br />“That’s when I moved out and started on the divorce.”<br /><br />A few months later, the children visited Charles and broke the bombshell news that Mills was their real father.<br /><br />He said: “They said, ‘Richard took swabs from our mouths’.<br /><br />“My wife refused to say why but a few weeks later they came again and the 12-year-old said, ‘You aren’t our dad’.<br /><br />“I said, ‘Of course I am’. And she said, ‘No Richard Mills has told us that he is’.”<br /><br />Charles got his solicitor to order DNA tests — and they confirmed the terrible truth.<br /><br />The ex-cop said he has only met Mills once and also seen him briefly at a court hearing.<br /><br />He added: “You couldn’t print what I really think of him, although I told him over the phone. He’s a total liar. His whole life’s been a lie and hers too. And I’ve been their victim.<br /><br />“Thanks to them I’ve lost everything — now I’m nothing but a lonely old man. I keep thinking what an idiot I was.”<br /><br />Mills last night did not deny our story. He asked: “Why’s that such big news?” Sarah confirmed she had had six of his children.<div class="blogger-post-footer">RSS feed</div>Harry Stantonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17389493043400033039noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7684984365529144784.post-1272113805527360072007-02-15T10:04:00.000+02:002007-02-15T10:06:13.341+02:00WOMEN ARE LİARS<span style="font-weight: bold;">Women are Liars.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">EDWARD BLACK</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">NINETEEN out of 20 women admit lying to their </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">partners or husbands, a survey on attitudes to truth </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">and relationships has found.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Eighty-three per cent owned up to telling "big, </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">life-changing lies", with 13 per cent saying they </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">did so frequently.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Half said that if they became pregnant by another </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">man but wanted to stay with their partner, they </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">would lie about the baby’s real father.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Forty-two per cent would lie about contraception </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">in order to get pregnant, no matter the wishes of </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">their partner.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">And an alarming 31 per cent said they would not </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">tell a future partner if they had a sexual disease: </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">this rises to 65 per cent among single women.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">In the poll of 5,000 women for That’s Life! </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">magazine, 45 per cent said they told "little white </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">lies" most days. The favourite untruth was "of </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">course you don’t look fat", with "these shoes were </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">only £10" in second place.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Jo Checkley, the editor of That’s Life! , said that </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">while many women now lied to avoid hurting their </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">partner’s feelings, covering up the truth about a </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">baby could have far more damaging </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">consequences.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">She said: "Modern women just can’t stop lying, but </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">they do it to stop hurting other people’s feelings. It </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">could be argued that these little white lies simply </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">make the world go round a little more smoothly. </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">But to tell a man a baby is his when it’s not, or to </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">deliberately get pregnant when your partner </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">doesn’t want a baby, is playing Russian roulette </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">with other people’s lives."</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">The National Scruples and Lies Survey 2004 found </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">plenty of untruths were told over the Christmas </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">period. A total of 78 per cent said they would pass </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">off a second-hand gift as a brand new present, </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">while half have lied about a Christmas card being </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">"lost in the post".</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Women will also lie to save people’s feelings, with </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">only 27 per cent saying they would tell a man if he </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">was hopeless in bed (although a third would tell </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">their friends all about it).</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Just over half would flatter a man if he asked them </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">about his looks and only 46 per cent would give </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">the "brutal truth". However, 61 per cent of women </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">would want their partners to be "brutally honest" if </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">they asked them "do I look fat?" or "do you think </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">my best friend’s attractive?"</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Elsewhere, 54 per cent admitted stealing sweets </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">or chocolates; 23 per cent would "sneak a bottle </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">or two" home if they were invited to a party by a </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">well-off friend; 49 per cent would "kiss and tell" to </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">the media for £25,000 if they had a one-night stand </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">with a celebrity; and 38 per cent say they would </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">marry purely for money.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Nearly half said they had faked orgasms and 55 </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">per cent admitted claiming they were tired, had a </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">headache, or felt ill to "get out of lovemaking".</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Nineteen per cent of women with a long-term </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">partner said they had cheated on him, while 30 </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">per cent of all women have had an affair with a </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">married man. Sixty-eight per cent said they did not </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">trust their partner.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">As far as trustworthy personalities are concerned, </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">the woman with "the most honest face" was Fern </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Britton, the This Morning host. She was followed </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">by the singer Kerry Katona (formerly McFadden), </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sharon Osbourne of The X Factor and the Queen.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">The "most honest male face" jointly went to Ant </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">and Dec, the presenters of I’m A Celebrity ... Get </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Me Out Of Here!, with Prince William second.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">The results come in the wake of the controversy </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">surrounding David Blunkett, the Home Secretary, </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">and his former lover, the publisher Kimberly </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Quinn. They had a child, but she kept details of </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">the affair secret from her husband Stephen, even </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">taking her son to Corfu for a week’s holiday to </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">bond with him this year.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Mr Quinn accepted his wife’s story, but she had </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">covered up the fact she was accompanied by Mr </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Blunkett.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">• The survey questioned 5,000 women, average </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">age 38, across Scotland, England, Wales and </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Northern Ireland.</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Top ten porkies</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">That’s Life! magazine has carried out its National </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Scruples and Lies Survey 2004 to find out the top </span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">ten lies told by women. They are:</span><br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">1. "Of course you don’t look fat!"</span><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">2. "These shoes were only £10."</span><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">3. "The bus/train was late."</span><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">4. "I’ve got a headache."</span><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">5. "I’ve only had one drink."</span><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">6. "That dress looks good on you."</span><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">7. "The cheque’s in the post."</span><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">8. "You look ten years younger."</span><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">9. "You’re wonderful in bed."</span><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">10. "I love you." </span><div class="blogger-post-footer">RSS feed</div>Harry Stantonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17389493043400033039noreply@blogger.com0